Wednesday, 14 January 2026

"The Great American Custody Battle"

So here’s a interesting topic for the week — and by “interesting,” I mean bizarre, wild, and so eye‑rolling that my eyeballs nearly filed a workplace injury report.

I genuinely wasn’t planning to watch it.

I tell you, I was just minding my business, living my life.

But the universe said,

“No, no. You. Sit down. You must witness this chaos.”

And suddenly there I was, watching events on YouTube as if I’d accidentally tuned into Storm Troopers versus the Department of Major Disapproval — one side came in tactical gear, the other came with protest banners.

Two Governments, One Citizen, Infinite Drama

In most countries, you get one government.

But no...not in America.  In America, you get two — like divorced parents who both insist they have full custody of your civil rights.

And why do I say this? Because many weeks ago, Minnesota discovered what happens when the federal parent a.k.a Bureau of Unexpected Enforcement (because I ain't naming names today) showed up unannounced, stomped into the state in combat boots, and said, “We're here to help.”

Spoiler:
Nobody felt helped. They felt fear.

The Incident: The Bureau vs. Protestor vs. Minnesota’s Blood Pressure

And worse still, a week back...things got truly ugly when the Bureau agent decided to showcase the full power of federal authority — wandering so deep into criminal‑offence territory that even the law paused to stare, and all captured from seventeen angles like a chaotic reality‑show. 

Minnesota’s Attorney General took one look at the footage and said:

“Absolutely not. Not in my state. Not on my snow.”

Within days, the AG was on TV announcing that Minnesota did have jurisdiction over the incident — and this time, it wasn’t bluster. It was law.

Because here’s the part people forget:

States 'absolutely can' prosecute federal agents who violate state criminal laws — as long as the agent’s actions fall outside their lawful federal duties.

So what does lawful federal duties mean? It means...the difference between....

“I’m doing my job”
vs.
“I’m doing whatever I feel like.”

There’s no magical immunity badge. Not like some folks in Washington who toss around the phrase “absolute immunity” the way children sprinkle glitter — enthusiastically, inaccurately, and everywhere.

There is no constitutional force field.

No “Sorry, I’m federal, you can’t touch me” clause.

If a federal agent steps outside the scope of their authority and breaks a state law, the state has every right to step forward and say:

“We’ll take it from here. And see you in court, buddy!"

Federalism: The Group Project Nobody Asked For

Here’s the thing about America’s government structure:

  • The federal government thinks it’s the boss.
  • The states think they are the boss.
  • The Supreme Court is the exhausted aunt who keeps saying, “Both of you stop shouting.”
  • And the citizen is the child in the backseat asking, “Are we there yet?” while the car is on fire.

So when the Bureau storms into Minnesota, the state is the teenager whose step‑parent barged into their room without knocking.

“You can’t just come in here!”

“I pay the mortgage.”

“This is MY space.”

“The Constitution says I can.”

“Well the Tenth Amendment says you can’t.”

Supremacy Clause.”

Anti‑Commandeering Doctrine.”

“Stop using big words.”

“Stop touching my residents.”

And somewhere in the background, the protestor is still on the ground wondering how they ended up in a crossover episode between Law & Order and Border Patrol.

The Real Lesson: Nobody Knows Who’s in Charge

The incident proves one thing:

America doesn’t have a government.
It has a group project.

And nobody is doing the same assignment.

  • The federal government is writing the conclusion.
  • The states are rewriting the introduction.
  • The Supreme Court is editing for grammar.
  • And the citizen is just trying to pass the class without getting tackled or worst.

What the Federal Government Controls

According to the constitutional framework, the federal government handles national‑level issues — things that cross state lines or affect the whole country.

Federal powers include:

  • Immigration
  • National security
  • Interstate commerce
  • Federal crimes (terrorism, drug trafficking, etc.)
  • Civil rights
  • Money printing (sadly, states cannot print their own money, though Florida would absolutely try)

Federal agencies like the FBI, DEA, and Homeland Security enforce federal laws everywhere in the country.

What the States Control

States handle the everyday stuff — the things that make your life either pleasant or miserable depending on where you live.

State powers include:

  • Policing
  • Education
  • Public health
  • Most criminal law (assault, theft, traffic violations)
  • Marriage, divorce, property, licensing
  • Deciding whether your tap water tastes like water or sadness

States have their own legislatures, courts, and police forces. They are not “branches” of the federal government — they are sovereign governments in their own right. 

The Anti‑Commandeering Doctrine: The Federal Government Cannot Boss States Around

This is where things get spicy.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government cannot force state officials to enforce federal laws.

This is called the Anti‑Commandeering Doctrine, rooted in the Tenth Amendment.

Translation:
The federal government can enforce its own laws, but it cannot make state police do the work for them.

This is why:

  • States can refuse to help with federal immigration enforcement.
  • States can say, “That sounds like a you problem, Washington.”

The Big Question: If the Federal Government Sends Agents Into a State, Can the State Defend Itself?

Legally:

  • Federal agents can enter any state to enforce federal law.
  • States cannot physically block them.
  • States cannot “defend themselves” with their own police.
  • That would be… a civil war.

BUT:
States can refuse to cooperate.
They can refuse to share data, resources, or manpower.
They can make the federal government do everything alone — slowly, expensively, and painfully.
They can take Federal agents to court if state laws were broken. 

This is why federalism is less “warfare” and more “passive‑aggressive marriage.”

The Real Comedy: Voting at the State Level Doesn’t Mean the State Is Sovereign

People often think:

“I voted for my governor, so my state is in charge.”

But the Supremacy Clause says — federal law wins when there’s a conflict. And if the state fails to satisfy the tests... poof! The case is dismissed.

So the satire is:

  • States act like independent kingdoms.
  • The federal government acts like the emperor.
  • The Supreme Court acts like the exhausted marriage counsellor.
  • Citizens act like children trying to sneak out past curfew.

In summary: 

For those who thought their individual vote could magically override the powers the Constitution gives the federal government… please. Think again. How charmingly cute!.

This isn’t a choose‑your‑own‑adventure book where you can scribble in the margins and change the ending.

The system is the system.

What actually matters is who you choose to run the federal government — because that’s the team holding the keys, the rulebook, and apparently the dramatic entrance music.


No comments:

Post a Comment